Indian Football News Updates

17727737757777781766

Comments

  • rudrarudra 2958 Points
    That's not IPL's or ISl's fault. That shows the fan culture our country has. Bollywood sells most, and cricket. It mentions in some countries it is opposite, but that's because it's a different Country. Same in politics, how many times they use Bollywood to get support and visibility. Basically you are saying change the mindset, well....
    Deb_Banreddevil87ArsenalFan700kartik91
  • Soham_DeSoham_De Kolkata1673 Points
    atlast atleast somebdy comes clear on oneleague:

    LEGENDARY EX FOOTBALLER and FC Goa coach Zico has reiterated his stance on how he thinks Indian football should carry forward -- by merging I-League and ISL to form one strong league that runs full season.

    Speaking to the New Indian Express, Zico said that without a strong league that lasts all season, the hard work done by ISL franchises to popularise the game falls apart,

    “Right now ISL clubs can’t qualify for the AFC Champions League. Last year, FC Goa did great work and generated support in Goa. Then in January, we went away and there was nothing. The players went back to their teams.”

    Right now none of the ISL franchises meet the licensing criteria set forth by Asian Football Confederation, or even the National License terms introduced by AIFF. Hence technically they are not real clubs, just as ISL is not a recognized league. This excludes them from any chance to play in the continental championships like AFC Champions League and AFC Cup. That right is reserved for the top clubs in the I-League; Mohun Bagan and Bengaluru FC at the moment.

    Zico said he was happy to complete the AFC licensing terms and accept their regulations of having less foreign players in the team, like I-League does,

    “I would like to see one strong league. We can follow the rules of the Asian federation — three foreign players and one Asian.”

    deepakcsamiamreddevil87goalkeeparkartik91DX
  • atuljgatuljg Trivandrum3986 Points
    I believe the foreign player restriction is limited to AFC tournaments and AIFF can increase or decrease it as per their wish. Or am I wrong? Can someone clarify?
  • deepakcdeepakc Mumbai 3416 Points
    Its a pvt tournament img can reduce the foreign players.will they?
  • @atuljg yes the number of foreign player is limited to AFC tournaments. League rules could be different. 
    atuljg
  • goalkeepargoalkeepar Turkish occupied Cyprus30051 Points
    yes u r right @atuljg that can be done after marge.
  • atuljgatuljg Trivandrum3986 Points
    edited November 2015
    @deepakc I was talking about I league, ISL, or whatever happens post merger or expansion. So, the foreign player restriction is for AFC cup and AFC champions League only. For I league it'll depend on what aiff decides
  • deepakcdeepakc Mumbai 3416 Points
    Frankly the discussion of PoST MERGER scenario is rhetorical...wont happen for 3 years at least IMO
    reddevil87Domnicarchak
  • BrainFallINDIABrainFallINDIA India7589 Points
    @atuljg Actually even though AFC have no say in the number of foreigners each team can have , they have a rule by which each team can only field 4(3+1) foreigners in a league match which is respectfully followed by every league in the AFC region.
    deepakc
  • BrainFallINDIABrainFallINDIA India7589 Points
    In short a team can only field 4(3+1) foreigners in a league game . It's a strict and non-flexible rule by AFC.
    deepakc
Sign In or Register to comment.