If the reason to divide the AFC into two replacement confederations - East Asia and West Asia - is logistical, then it would be difficult to argue that Oceania should join a new East Asia Confederation because the distance is too far.
I am not opposed to splitting the AFC into two separate confederations, but I think Pakistan, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh should join the West with Bhutan and Nepal joining the East, so the balance would be:
West: 23 members East: 24 members
Keeping the three largest South Asian countries together is important for the commercial viability of a West Asian Confederation.
the problem with India going into west is that we will be stuck with playing against camel milk drinking countries. I am tired of seeing them playing against countries. I want to see India playing against Japan, Korea, Indonesia, China etc.
the problem with India going into west is that we will be stuck with playing against camel milk drinking countries. I am tired of seeing them playing against countries. I want to see India playing against Japan, Korea, Indonesia, China etc.
That works, the countries you mentioned have the largest share of lactose intolerant people in the world.
Comments
I am not opposed to splitting the AFC into two separate confederations, but I think Pakistan, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh should join the West with Bhutan and Nepal joining the East, so the balance would be:
West: 23 members
East: 24 members
Keeping the three largest South Asian countries together is important for the commercial viability of a West Asian Confederation.
I am tired of seeing them playing against countries. I want to see India playing against Japan, Korea, Indonesia, China etc.