Even though I league is important for national team and its future, ISL has advantage over its rival because people want to see good and standard football for the price they have paid to get the ticket.
In India, apart from kirket, people want to come for entertainment, they don't have passion and all that.
If football wants to be a popular sport then its ISL. Also I may be biased because of No i league team from kerala which is sad.
Unless Kerala gets a club in I-League, there would be zilch oppurtunities for young Malayali kids. IMG wouldnt think twice to shut out KBFC if they cant play players and invite bad press.
what quality they are talking about ...just by running faster than 35+ years of age old foreigners will make them better .. reality is checked in i-league...John Johnson still better df in combined i-liga and isl
and RAFI talking about quality ...make Bhutan play against sri Lanka ...match will be high tempo and will look competitive..
Bhutan vs. Sri Lanka was not competitive or high tempo. Sri Lanka actually had more of the ball but had no clue what to do with it while Bhutan had a chance and took it.
Also, I-Liga... that is just worse than Atletico de Kolkata.
Comments
If football wants to be a popular sport then its ISL. Also I may be biased because of No i league team from kerala which is sad.
and RAFI talking about quality ...make Bhutan play against sri Lanka ...match will be high tempo and will look competitive..