The Economics of the Indian Super League

24567

Comments

  • atuljgatuljg Trivandrum3983 Points
    I believe that most of the franchisees actually made a profit! The term "considerable loss" is a heavy word. If that's the case, there wouldn't be a second edition. But, it's not the scenario and a second edition is definitely on. Only insiders in the franchisee will know the exact economics as none of the franchisees are public companies.
  • goalkeepargoalkeepar Turkish occupied Cyprus29900 Points
    no all teams are in loss.
    AKB
  • DomnicDomnic 2315 Points
    edited January 2015
    Owners themselves said it will take 3-4 years to atleast break even. Watch Dempo n Salgaocar interview on prudent media. Its on you tube. You will get your answer. Rest is up to you. Whether you belive or not.
    bida 25
  • munna219777munna219777 28557 Points
    Abhishek Bachchan lost money?
    :P
  • archakarchak 2082 Points
    Most isl teams have targeted to break even by 4th year
    Deb_Ban
  • atuljgatuljg Trivandrum3983 Points

    An article on the economics in Business Standard



    The Hero Indian Super League is
    already a few matches old. After a glittering inauguration at Kolkata's
    Salt Lake stadium, the league has got down to the serious business of
    providing entertainment to football fans while, at the same time, giving
    a fillip to the sport in the country. In other words, football has
    arrived in India with this Rs 800-crore event promoted by IMG-Reliance and Star India.



    Modelled largely on cricket's successful Indian Premier League, ISL's
    promoters and franchise owners believe the league can change the face of
    football in a country where cricket is almost a religion. More
    importantly, they feel the event will prove a financial success. IPL had
    the advantage of cricket already being a massively popular sport when
    it began. ISL, in contrast, will probably take a few years to win the
    confidence of the advertisers. "It's the first time that something of
    this scale has been attempted for football in the country and the
    execution of the inaugural season will set the course," says Karthik
    Lakshminarayan, COO, Madison Infinity, a media planning and buying
    agency, "ISL does have the potential to become the IPL of football, but
    the stakeholders may have to wait for two to three years."



    Dhirendra Singh, associate vice-president & head planning at BPN, a
    media planning and buying agency, says advertisers stand to benefit from
    ISL because of the effort its organisers are putting in creating
    awareness about the event and keeping the audience engaged.



    Who gains and who loses

    For sponsors and advertisers, the formative years of ISL will entail an
    element of risk. "For instance," points out Lakshminarayan, "you do not
    see the e-commerce players as ISL sponsors this year because they would
    not want to take a risk at this stage in their growth cycle."



    But some others have seen potential in what is India's most extravagant
    football event ever. Led by Hero Motocorp as the title sponsor, Maruti
    Suzuki India has also endorsed the league as an associate sponsor, while
    brands like Puma, Pepsi, Muthoot and Amul have come on board as
    official partners.





    The first season of IPL made an estimated Rs 450 crore in advertising
    revenue for Multi Screen Media, the official broadcaster of the event.
    In seven years since, the advertising and sponsorship revenues have more
    than doubled to Rs 950 crore. While the football parallel might not
    prove so dynamic in terms of monetary growth, it is still encouraging,
    say media planners and buyers, that ISL's journey has started with
    television ad rates in the range of Rs 50,000 to Rs 75,000 for 10
    seconds. This may seem low given that in its first year IPL commanded
    spot rates of Rs 1.5-2 lakh for 10 seconds, but it was largely owing to
    cricket's relative strength as a mass sport. "Since the base is smaller
    than the cricket league, the football event can hope to grow faster over
    the next two to three years," says a media planner.



    For the franchises though, the story is quite different, because they
    can look at shorter break-even schedules, unlike in IPL, where with
    significantly higher investments, most of the franchises are yet to
    break even after seven years. The IPL franchises also face volatility in
    the fees because they are fixed in dollars, and are dependent,
    therefore, on the performance of the rupee against the dollar.



    "Football is a sport that needs to be pushed in India and the organisers
    knew they had to offer stability to the investors to encourage
    participation. Thus a decision was taken to denote the franchise fees of
    ISL in Indian rupees," says a person close to the promoters. In a
    similar vein, the base price for the auction of the franchises was kept
    the same across cities at Rs 12 crore. In the case of IPL, the base
    price differed from city to city.



    The average franchise fee in ISL is Rs 15 crore, while the estimated
    expense of a team for the first season is Rs 45-50 crore. This includes
    player acquisition, promotion and team management. Analysts say that the
    franchises can hope to recover close to Rs 20 crore in the first year
    from gate revenues, central revenue (on-ground and on-air sponsorship)
    and sponsorship revenues.



    Playing it safe

    In addition to factoring in an incubation period of three to five years,
    some franchises have also started hedging the risk from the first year
    itself by getting on board new investors. Late in the day, Indian
    cricketer Virat Kohli picked up a minority stake in the Goa franchise as
    did Indian cricket captain MS Dhoni in the Chennai team. Actor Hrithik
    Roshan happily filled in for his senior in the fraternity, Salman Khan,
    who backed out as recently as a week ago.



    "I personally feel that while people are ready to wait for three years
    to near break even on their profit-and- loss account, some teams may
    prefer to stay in the near break-even phase and ramp up investments in
    building valuation for their teams," says Gaurav Modwel, CEO of Pune
    City FC. "In such a case, the fourth and the fifth year would be used to
    up the premium of the outfit to attract investors rather than chase
    profitability. It will depend on where the respective team stands at
    that point in time."



    With three co-owners, the franchise promotership of Chennaiyin FC is settled as of now, but co-owner Abhishek Bachchan does
    not rule out the possibility of getting more people on board "as long
    as they share the passion for football and bring value to the team". He
    is optimistic about ISL, given his experience with the Pro Kabaddi
    League in which he owns the eventual winners, the Jaipur Pink Panthers.
    "In Pro Kabaddi, I had factored a three-to-four-year break-even period.
    But given the response to the league and our team's performance, I can
    now hope to break even as early as March 2015 and possibly move into
    profits the season after that," says Bachchan.



    In the case of Mumbai City FC, the promoters feel that if at all they
    would divest a stake, it would be to an established foreign club. Others
    like the Den Networks-promoted Delhi Dynamos may look at investors in
    the second year as well. But these are for the future. As Bachchan puts
    it, "It's all about getting the league on the ground this year. Next
    year, people will be better oriented to take a call on strategy and
    build on the work done in the first year."
    footydip
  • atuljgatuljg Trivandrum3983 Points
    From what I understand, the franchisees in ISL are much better positioned than the ones in IPL and they are in loss but it's not considerable as was mentioned.
  • gaffertapegaffertape 13021 Points
    Considerable is a relative term...

    Delhi Dynamos spent around 52-60crores...and got back 8-10 crores...

    BFC in year 1 spent 18 crore and probably made 3 Crores

    Return on inveinvestment wise DO might be better....BUT can Den networks afford to lose 40 Cross for another 4 years ??

    Has can easily "lose" 20crores/year
    ArsenalFan700munna219777reddevil87
  • ArsenalFan700ArsenalFan700 Reddit13655 Points
    That article does not help to explain the mechanics of the league. It just gives us numbers.
  • DomnicDomnic 2315 Points
    edited January 2015
    Why is nobody considering the insurance cost. Does insurance company return back the money if no claims. :P

    http://m.timesofindia.com/sports/football/indian-super-league/top-stories/ISL-Footballers-to-get-Rs-600-crore-pay-cover/articleshow/44686701.cms

    http://m.thehindu.com/sport/football/indian-super-league-footballers-to-get-insurance/article6481335.ece/
    (For those who ridicule TOI)

    Quote "All franchisees have taken elaborate insurance covers, ranging from Rs 50 crore to Rs 60 crore that covers, most importantly, player salaries, apart from personal accident policy, mediclaim, travel insurance, public liability and loss of ticketing for the clubs.

    The total insurance cover for the ISL, according to one source, is approximately Rs 600 crore. Each franchise is spending close to Rs 50 crore while the league itself has a cover of Rs 200 crore.

    For the first time, the insurance covers a player's loss of salary" Unquote.
    munna219777
Sign In or Register to comment.