@ArsenalFan700 , I have nothing against Pune City. It is just that the league can practically have not more than 12 teams, and I decided to take top 6 ISL sides and fill balance 4 slots with IL clubs. Isn't it fair?
Pune flunks as a footballing centre. there are other deserving football regions than Pune in a limited space league.
Mumbai City FC should take over the Pune academy. Indian football would be served better by having another club from NE and Kerala rather than a club in Pune or Delhi.
or rather mumbai city should take over I league Mumbai FC and Pune should rename as Maharashtra united and keep ISL matches in Kolhapur, Nagpur, Nasik etc
It’s not like it goes completely into the BCCI’s coffers. The broadcast revenue is shared between the BCCI and the franchises. Within the BCCI, it’s shared at a 70-30 basis between state associations and the board itself. Earlier, the franchises were paying a franchise fee. After 10 years, that’s not there. So what happens now is actually 50-50 in terms of the broadcast revenue. But they have to pay BCCI 20 per cent of their revenues. 20 per cent of 50 is 10 per cent, so that’s how it becomes 60 to us and 40 to them. This is leaving all the taxes aside.
Comments
Pune flunks as a footballing centre. there are other deserving football regions than Pune in a limited space league.
Indian football roadmap: Ex-Premier League secretary set to meet stakeholders
http://www.hindustantimes.com/football/indian-football-roadmap-ex-premier-league-secretary-set-to-meet-stakeholders/story-PC2YTADwTKILcurfIam02L.html
Any idea what does ISL franchise contract says