@ashindia, even though i don't trust AIFF, i trust FIFA. They have been lenient to India for the time being. But this sleeping giant needs to be spanked for waking up and i want them to do it ASAP.
Tge best form of unification would be eight Super Cup Q finalists plus ISL Champ & IL Champ. -- 10 teams. So 6 IL clubs & 4 ISL franchises. Can be expanded with 2 promotions each year.
Yesterday I saw this dream where I was attending AIFF meeting and they decided to merge ISL, I-League and even I-League 2nd Division to have conference style league.
AFC-backed report proposes unified league for India
A unified domestic Indian football league with promotion and relegation to replace the concurrent Indian Super League (ISL) and I-League is the key recommendation made by consultants appointed by the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) in a confidential report. The report also proposes an incremental expansion to a minimum of 16 teams by 2022-23. The All India Football Federation (AIFF), which received the recommendations this February, faces exclusion from AFC club competitions like the AFC Champions League and AFC Cup if they fail to comply with the recommendations.
What is the current two-league system?
India has had concurrent leagues running since the 2014-15 season, wherein the I-League is still retained as the top division, with reigning champions Minerva Punjab set to represent India at the AFC Champions League playoffs in 2019. ISL champions Chennaiyin FC are guaranteed a spot in the 2019 AFC Cup, though it was understood to be an exemption made only for a season.
How and why did this report come about?
A suggestion to look into a roadmap for Indian football is part of AFC's brief of improving the standards of domestic football across AFC nations. According to sources, this came about after the poor showing by all four AFC representatives in the 2014 World Cup in Brazil -- Australia, Japan, Iran and South Korea all finished last in their respective groups. The report was compiled by Alex Phillips, Head of Asia-Europe Affairs, AFC, and former Premier League general secretary Nic Coward, a professional consultant for FIFA. Their brief was to establish a "widely-supported, robust, Medium-/Long-Term' roadmap for the sustainable development of Indian Club Football." They reviewed AIFF's existing strategy, interviewed key stakeholders in Indian football, researched the impact of ISL and reviewed different scenarios to compile the report.
What are the recommendations?
For 2018-19
Playoffs: While AIFF could retain the concurrent 10-team ISL and I-League for 2018-19, an equal number of top teams from both leagues should play off for the “Indian Championship title” to win the right to represent India in AFC competitions in 2020.
For 2019-20 onward
Unified top league: ISL (assumed to be the top tier), to start with 12 teams in 2019-20. Two additional teams should be promoted for each further ISL season -- hence leading to 12 teams in 2019-20, 14 in 2020-21 and 16 in 2021-22. These teams could either be the I-League champions and one team through an open tender basis, or runners-up of the I-League.
Relegation: Should begin from 2021-22 or latest by 2022-23 [at present, there is a 10-year “no relegation” clause guaranteed to every ISL club, who are understood to be paying an annual franchise fee of INR 15 crore or about $ 2.2 million, active till 2024-25]. Three tiers of 16 teams each by the 2023-24 at the latest, with two teams relegated and promoted from each tier on an annual basis.
No-city exclusivity: This has meant ATK has been the only ISL team from Kolkata for instance. The application of this rule from 2019-20 itself could allow traditional teams like Mohun Bagan and East Bengal to join the ISL and play their matches out of Kolkata itself.
Franchise fees: New teams joining the ISL should pay a lower franchise fee, bearing a smaller share of the central payments until relegation starts, at which point the franchise fee should be terminated altogether.
What are AIFF's options?
An Indian football insider believes these suggestions will have to be implemented "sooner or later", as all domestic leagues have to fall in line with AFC statutes. Article 7 of the AFC statutes, insists that participation in any domestic league has to be "principally on sporting merit", and that any club can continue to participate in any division of the league only on the basis of promotion or relegation. The threat of being de-recognised and barred from AFC competition would mean these changes could come into effect either next season or the one after at the latest, according to the insider.
How viable are the changes?
An official in the know of ISL workings believes there could be considerable resistance within to these changes. The instability among club ownership patterns and growing disillusionment among some members about ISL's revenue model mean the clubs are thinking short-term, and are unlikely to agree to a long-term structure overhaul. The official believes there's a likelihood that Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL), the IMG-Reliance subsidy that runs the ISL and I-League, might not respond to the report for the moment, concentrating entirely on the AFC Asian Cup in January and the national team's preparations in the lead-up to the same. They might close the ISL out from promotion and relegation altogether, the official added.
ISL's city-exclusivity has meant two teams from the same city haven't been able to compete in the league. AIFF Media
What's the response?
The AIFF has officially said that they have not received any communication from the AFC. AFC are yet to respond to a few questions about the report posed to them, while UEFA, where one of the co-writers of the report works, have declined to comment to on the report for "confidentiality reasons" and asked that all questions be directed at the AIFF.
What's the next step likely to be?
While AFC has shown flexibility on club licensing, league structure and other issues with Indian football in the past, "there is a limit for everything" and they (India) will have to comply with practices around the world. "There have been no discussions yet, and the important thing will be to decide on the merger of the two leagues. How long do they [FSDL] want the league to run and with how many teams," the insider said.
Comments
Should be right on merit.
AFC-backed report proposes unified league for India
A unified domestic Indian football league with promotion and relegation to replace the concurrent Indian Super League (ISL) and I-League is the key recommendation made by consultants appointed by the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) in a confidential report. The report also proposes an incremental expansion to a minimum of 16 teams by 2022-23. The All India Football Federation (AIFF), which received the recommendations this February, faces exclusion from AFC club competitions like the AFC Champions League and AFC Cup if they fail to comply with the recommendations.
What is the current two-league system?
India has had concurrent leagues running since the 2014-15 season, wherein the I-League is still retained as the top division, with reigning champions Minerva Punjab set to represent India at the AFC Champions League playoffs in 2019. ISL champions Chennaiyin FC are guaranteed a spot in the 2019 AFC Cup, though it was understood to be an exemption made only for a season.
How and why did this report come about?
A suggestion to look into a roadmap for Indian football is part of AFC's brief of improving the standards of domestic football across AFC nations. According to sources, this came about after the poor showing by all four AFC representatives in the 2014 World Cup in Brazil -- Australia, Japan, Iran and South Korea all finished last in their respective groups. The report was compiled by Alex Phillips, Head of Asia-Europe Affairs, AFC, and former Premier League general secretary Nic Coward, a professional consultant for FIFA. Their brief was to establish a "widely-supported, robust, Medium-/Long-Term' roadmap for the sustainable development of Indian Club Football." They reviewed AIFF's existing strategy, interviewed key stakeholders in Indian football, researched the impact of ISL and reviewed different scenarios to compile the report.
What are the recommendations?
Playoffs: While AIFF could retain the concurrent 10-team ISL and I-League for 2018-19, an equal number of top teams from both leagues should play off for the “Indian Championship title” to win the right to represent India in AFC competitions in 2020.
Unified top league: ISL (assumed to be the top tier), to start with 12 teams in 2019-20. Two additional teams should be promoted for each further ISL season -- hence leading to 12 teams in 2019-20, 14 in 2020-21 and 16 in 2021-22. These teams could either be the I-League champions and one team through an open tender basis, or runners-up of the I-League.
Relegation: Should begin from 2021-22 or latest by 2022-23 [at present, there is a 10-year “no relegation” clause guaranteed to every ISL club, who are understood to be paying an annual franchise fee of INR 15 crore or about $ 2.2 million, active till 2024-25]. Three tiers of 16 teams each by the 2023-24 at the latest, with two teams relegated and promoted from each tier on an annual basis.
No-city exclusivity: This has meant ATK has been the only ISL team from Kolkata for instance. The application of this rule from 2019-20 itself could allow traditional teams like Mohun Bagan and East Bengal to join the ISL and play their matches out of Kolkata itself.
Franchise fees: New teams joining the ISL should pay a lower franchise fee, bearing a smaller share of the central payments until relegation starts, at which point the franchise fee should be terminated altogether.
What are AIFF's options?
An Indian football insider believes these suggestions will have to be implemented "sooner or later", as all domestic leagues have to fall in line with AFC statutes. Article 7 of the AFC statutes, insists that participation in any domestic league has to be "principally on sporting merit", and that any club can continue to participate in any division of the league only on the basis of promotion or relegation. The threat of being de-recognised and barred from AFC competition would mean these changes could come into effect either next season or the one after at the latest, according to the insider.
How viable are the changes?
An official in the know of ISL workings believes there could be considerable resistance within to these changes. The instability among club ownership patterns and growing disillusionment among some members about ISL's revenue model mean the clubs are thinking short-term, and are unlikely to agree to a long-term structure overhaul. The official believes there's a likelihood that Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL), the IMG-Reliance subsidy that runs the ISL and I-League, might not respond to the report for the moment, concentrating entirely on the AFC Asian Cup in January and the national team's preparations in the lead-up to the same. They might close the ISL out from promotion and relegation altogether, the official added.
What's the response?
The AIFF has officially said that they have not received any communication from the AFC. AFC are yet to respond to a few questions about the report posed to them, while UEFA, where one of the co-writers of the report works, have declined to comment to on the report for "confidentiality reasons" and asked that all questions be directed at the AIFF.
What's the next step likely to be?
While AFC has shown flexibility on club licensing, league structure and other issues with Indian football in the past, "there is a limit for everything" and they (India) will have to comply with practices around the world. "There have been no discussions yet, and the important thing will be to decide on the merger of the two leagues. How long do they [FSDL] want the league to run and with how many teams," the insider said.