rudra said: only personal connections work in these cases
like arunavo's blog. although he does some good reporting and posts some good articles but most of them are almost copy pasted from other sites and very late.
Personally. the IFN team feels very sad for not getting the due recognition. Its almost as if 2 years of work has been discounted. But, that does not stop us from going ahead and going strong.
Just out of curiosity. It says "Key stakeholders in Indian football media".
I would venture to think that means that you would have to pay to get recognition or am I just way off the mark here. I am just looking for a reason why we are not there. Forget Sportskeeda who only have 1 good writer in Amoy.
> archak said:
> ifn is mainly a forum for the fans to discuss about indian football. while the other sites are mainly intrested in publishing news.....
IFN also has a blog. Mind you I wonder how popular the blog is compared to the forum.
Comments
rudra said: only personal connections work in these cases
like arunavo's blog. although he does some good reporting and posts some good articles but most of them are almost copy pasted from other sites and very late.
Personally. the IFN team feels very sad for not getting the due recognition. Its almost as if 2 years of work has been discounted. But, that does not stop us from going ahead and going strong.
Just out of curiosity. It says "Key stakeholders in Indian football media".
I think by saying "Key stakeholders in Indian football media" they ment to say, who are actively promoting football in india through media.
ifn is mainly a forum for the fans to discuss about indian football. while the other sites are mainly intrested in publishing news.....
> archak said:
> ifn is mainly a forum for the fans to discuss about indian football. while the other sites are mainly intrested in publishing news.....
i know that bro and thats the main reason i said "mainly".......
> archak said:
> i know that bro and thats the main reason i said "mainly".......
what are u not sure about???
> archak said:
> what are u not sure about???