Funny, If I did support CSK I wouldn't be in this forum picking holes on your hypocritical support and club.
Why hypocritical? Owner of BFC tweets that expects BFC to be part of top tier of ISL while its fans fight for being in I-league and pride themselves to be anti -ISL.
There isnt any connection in what the club management wants and what it's minority section of fans want.
I-league is a failed product no point beating a dead horse. It doesn't matter if ISL is merged with I-league or not only MB, BFC, EB and now AFC are the only ones that can be retained in the top tier. Rest of them are fine to be playing in tier 2.
Regarding the WC
No matter what u say, fact remains that WC is being played here which has never happened. Am completely against what AIFF have done since the late 90's but u-17 WC is not one among them.
I'm following Indian football before birth of both Leagues, Neither glitz or glamour doesn't attract me nor shabby games. I'll be fighting for better League
1> Independent League Management (Club Owners + AIFF ) 2> Revenue shared between clubs and AIFF( Telecast + Advertising ) 3> Pass the AFC criteria 4> Fully functional league along with state leagues.
I don't want third party eating all the fruits or revenue shouldn't flow out of AIFF
AIFF should manage only NT + YT + Santosh Trophy + Establish the 8 regional academy until we can depend on clubs to produce players.
Why is anyone surprised that Bengaluru FC would try to get into ISL despite what was said about AFC? First off, the path way is clear if they get into ISL apparently, that they can play ISL and then make it through the Super Cup or whatever it is. Secondly, they are a business as well and would join whatever they feel could give them more money, meaning more fans etc. which ISL probably would do a lot more than I-League.
ISL teams will be allowed to compete in AFC tournaments ? Where is the Criteria ? Is it applicable to Indian clubs only so that AIFF can eliminate them ? If ISL teams are eligible for AFC then why United Sports, Mohammedan Sp, Churchill were thrown out of the I-League ? Is Aunty rule prevailing in AFC as well ?
ISL could probably pass whatever criteria is needed in two seconds, especially in a longer league in which more investment on things like infrastructure would be needed. If clubs in Hong Kong and Vietnam can do it, you really don't think ISL sides could as well?
Comments
Funny, If I did support CSK I wouldn't be in this forum picking holes on your hypocritical support and club.
Why hypocritical? Owner of BFC tweets that expects BFC to be part of top tier of ISL while its fans fight for being in I-league and pride themselves to be anti -ISL.
There isnt any connection in what the club management wants and what it's minority section of fans want.
I-league is a failed product no point beating a dead horse. It doesn't matter if ISL is merged with I-league or not only MB, BFC, EB and now AFC are the only ones that can be retained in the top tier. Rest of them are fine to be playing in tier 2.
Regarding the WC
No matter what u say, fact remains that WC is being played here which has never happened. Am completely against what AIFF have done since the late 90's but u-17 WC is not one among them.
I'm following Indian football before birth of both Leagues, Neither glitz or glamour doesn't attract me nor shabby games. I'll be fighting for better League
1> Independent League Management (Club Owners + AIFF )
2> Revenue shared between clubs and AIFF( Telecast + Advertising )
3> Pass the AFC criteria
4> Fully functional league along with state leagues.
I don't want third party eating all the fruits or revenue shouldn't flow out of AIFF
AIFF should manage only NT + YT + Santosh Trophy + Establish the 8 regional academy until we can depend on clubs to produce players.
World is not black and white but extremely Grey my friend.