So, here are the results for the 1st day:
Cluster I: Assam 8-1 Puducherry
Cluster II: Chhattisgarh 9-0 Daman & Diu, Uttar Pradesh 3-1 Gujarat
Cluster III: Manipur 4-1 Bihar
Sorry, I think I've been picking up some tips from the AIFF site <!-- s:? --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" /><!-- s:? -->
2 matches today in Cluster IV:
Kerala 5-1 Jammu & Kashmir
malayalam news channels are reporting the news from morning,they all say its 5-1,they even provided live updates,so I guess its AIFF with the mistake as usual,
As usual by AIFF. Hey donot highlight it anymore as they donot care about the site at all
Well, I was not sure when I wrote the message if AIFF was wrong or if the 5-1 score was wrong - I was hoping that AIFF got it right this time. If they do not care about the site, then they should not have a site. If someone is being paid to update the site, then we must question how this can be justified. It shouldn't be a case of "Oh, the AIFF don't care about the site, so we don't care". Somebody has to make AIFF accountable - this is their window to the world after all.
Comments
Sorry, I think I've been picking up some tips from the AIFF site <!-- s:? --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" /><!-- s:? -->
2 matches today in Cluster IV:
Kerala 5-1 Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand v Chandigarh result to come...
R Kannan - 4
Martin John
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://footballkerala.com/2011/05/07/kerala-win-santosh-trophy-opener/">http://footballkerala.com/2011/05/07/ke ... hy-opener/</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://the-aiff.com/pages/tournament/tournament-fixtures.php?tournamentdetail=22">http://the-aiff.com/pages/tournament/to ... tdetail=22</a><!-- m -->
Kannan - 4, Martin John; J&K - Haider
Well, I was not sure when I wrote the message if AIFF was wrong or if the 5-1 score was wrong - I was hoping that AIFF got it right this time. If they do not care about the site, then they should not have a site. If someone is being paid to update the site, then we must question how this can be justified. It shouldn't be a case of "Oh, the AIFF don't care about the site, so we don't care". Somebody has to make AIFF accountable - this is their window to the world after all.